ArticlePLOS digital health2024
Machine learning approaches in non-contact autofluorescence spectrum classification.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Manual surgical resection of soft tissue sarcoma tissue can involve many challenges, including the critical need for precise determination of tumor boundary with normal tissue and limitations of current surgical instrumentation, in addition to standard risks of infection or tissue healing difficulty. Substantial research has been conducted in the biomedical sensing landscape for development of non-human contact sensing devices. One such point-of-care platform, previously devised by our group, utilizes autofluorescence-based spectroscopic signatures to highlight important physiological differences in tumorous and healthy tissue. The following study builds on this work, implementing classification algorithms, including Artificial Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbors, to diagnose freshly resected murine tissue as sarcoma or healthy. Classification accuracies of over 93% are achieved with Logistic Regression, and Area Under the Curve scores over 94% are achieved with Support Vector Machines, delineating a clear way to automate photonic diagnosis of ambiguous tissue in assistance of surgeons. These interpretable algorithms can also be linked to important physiological diagnostic indicators, unlike the black-box ANN architecture. This is the first known study to use machine learning to interpret data from a non-contact autofluorescence sensing device on sarcoma tissue, and has direct applications in rapid intraoperative sensing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.