Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383163›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Risk of death in England following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test: A retrospective national cohort study (March 2020 to September 2022).

Clarissa Bauer-Staeb, Richard James Holleyman, Sharmani Barnard, Andrew Hughes, Samantha Dunn, Sebastian Fox, Justine Fitzpatrick, John Newton, Paul Fryers, Paul Burton and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Clarissa Bauer-StaebOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, United Kingdom.
Richard James HolleymanUK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9748-7932
Sharmani BarnardSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Andrew HughesOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, United Kingdom.
Samantha DunnOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, United Kingdom.
Sebastian FoxOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, United Kingdom.
Justine FitzpatrickOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, United Kingdom.
John NewtonOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, United Kingdom.
Paul FryersOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, United Kingdom.
Paul BurtonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Peter GoldblattDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, UCL Institute of Health Equity, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0491-2077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to estimate the relative risk of mortality following a first positive SARS-CoV-2 test during the first, second, and third waves of the COVID-19pandemic in England by age, sex, and vaccination status, taking into account pre-existing health conditions and lifestyle factors.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all individuals registered with the National Health Service (NHS) in England from 1 March 2020 to September 2022. Data for all individuals were obtained and linked including primary care records, hospital admission episodes, SARS-CoV-2 test results, vaccinations, and death registrations. We fitted Cox Proportional Hazards models with time dependent covariates for confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection to model the risk of subsequent mortality.

resultsThe hazard ratio for death after testing positive for subsequent, compared with those not testing positive, amongst unvaccinated individuals, ranged from 11 to 89 by age and sex, in the first four weeks following a positive test in wave one and reduced to 14 to 50 in wave three. This hazard was further reduced amongst those who had three vaccines to between 1.4 and 7 in wave three.

conclusionsThis study provides robust estimates of increased mortality risk among those who tested positive over the first three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in England. The estimates show the impact of various factors affecting the risk of mortality from COVID-19. The results provide the first step towards estimating the magnitude and pattern of mortality displacement due to COVID-19, which is essential to understanding subsequent mortality rates in England.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildCOVID-19 TestingEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39383163
PMCPMC11463829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.