ArticlePloS one2024
Evaluating Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques in chest radiology imaging through a human-centered Lens.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Demystifying Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Which explainable AI methods in medical imaging are clinically impactful? A systematic literature review addressing the clinician's perspective.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Responsible artificial intelligence in medical imaging: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning for cardiac CT segmentation for congenital heart disease: A systematic review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Human-AI interaction and collaboration in radiology: from conceptual frameworks to responsible implementation.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in paediatric chest imaging: applications, challenges, and future directions.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- A survey of explainable AI applications in infectious disease diagnosis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for chest radiography: an overview of techniques, challenges, and future directions.npj health systems · 2026Review
- UbiQTree: Uncertainty quantification in XAI with tree ensembles.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Narrative review: the research advances of artificial intelligence in the prediction of pulmonary nodule growth.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Prescribing a dose of transparency: a qualitative evaluation of AI explanations with cardiovascular healthcare professionals.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Attention-Enhanced Hybrid Bidirectional LSTM and Temporal Convolutional Network for Early Detection of Lung Cancer in Low-Dose CT Scans.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Article
- Explained Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Detection in Volumetric CT Images Aligned with the British Society of Thoracic Imaging Reporting Guidance: A Pilot Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Explainable AI-Driven Analysis of Radiology Reports Using Text and Image Data: Experimental Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Clinician perspectives on explainability in AI-driven closed-loop neurotechnology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Explainable deep learning for age and gender estimation in dental CBCT scans using attention mechanisms and multi task learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Explainable AI in medicine: challenges of integrating XAI into the future clinical routine.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
- Individualized Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis Using RP-GAN: Leveraging Global Lung Features and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- The user experiences of AI-based clinical decision support systems and implications for usage over time: A scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of radiology imaging has experienced a remarkable increase in using of deep learning (DL) algorithms to support diagnostic and treatment decisions. This rise has led to the development of Explainable AI (XAI) system to improve the transparency and trust of complex DL methods. However, XAI systems face challenges in gaining acceptance within the healthcare sector, mainly due to technical hurdles in utilizing these systems in practice and the lack of human-centered evaluation/validation. In this study, we focus on visual XAI systems applied to DL-enabled diagnostic system in chest radiography. In particular, we conduct a user study to evaluate two prominent visual XAI techniques from the human perspective. To this end, we created two clinical scenarios for diagnosing pneumonia and COVID-19 using DL techniques applied to chest X-ray and CT scans. The achieved accuracy rates were 90% for pneumonia and 98% for COVID-19. Subsequently, we employed two well-known XAI methods, Grad-CAM (Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations), to generate visual explanations elucidating the AI decision-making process. The visual explainability results were shared through a user study, undergoing evaluation by medical professionals in terms of clinical relevance, coherency, and user trust. In general, participants expressed a positive perception of the use of XAI systems in chest radiography. However, there was a noticeable lack of awareness regarding their value and practical aspects. Regarding preferences, Grad-CAM showed superior performance over LIME in terms of coherency and trust, although concerns were raised about its clinical usability. Our findings highlight key user-driven explainability requirements, emphasizing the importance of multi-modal explainability and the necessity to increase awareness of XAI systems among medical practitioners. Inclusive design was also identified as a crucial need to ensure better alignment of these systems with user needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.