Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39383030›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2024

Sparse-Coding Variational Autoencoders.

Victor Geadah, Gabriel Barello, Daniel Greenidge, Adam S Charles, Jonathan W Pillow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victor GeadahProgram in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. victor.geadah@princeton.edu.
Gabriel BarelloInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, U.S.A. gabrielbarello@gmail.com.
Daniel GreenidgeDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. daniel@danielgreenidge.com.
Adam S CharlesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Department Center for Imaging Science, and Department Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218, U.S.A. adamsc@jhu.edu.
Jonathan W PillowPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. pillow@princeton.edu.

Funding

Training in Methods of Computational Neuroscience (MCN)R25MH062204 · NIMH · MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY · PI Stefano Fusi, Linda E Hyman · 2000 to 2026
$4.5M
Neural time-integration underlying higher cognitive functionR01EY017366 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HUK, ALEXANDER C, PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM · 2008 to 2016
$2.9M
Dissecting Sensorimotor Pathways Underlying Social Interactions: Models, Circuits, and BehaviorR01NS104899 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BIALEK, WILLIAM, MURTHY, MALA · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Adaptive statistical algorithms for learning and control of neural dynamicsRF1DA056404 · NIDA · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI PARK, IL MEMMING, PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM · 2022 to 2022
$969k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017366NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA056404NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH062204NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sparse coding model posits that the visual system has evolved to efficiently code natural stimuli using a sparse set of features from an overcomplete dictionary. The original sparse coding model suffered from two key limitations; however: (1) computing the neural response to an image patch required minimizing a nonlinear objective function via recurrent dynamics and (2) fitting relied on approximate inference methods that ignored uncertainty. Although subsequent work has developed several methods to overcome these obstacles, we propose a novel solution inspired by the variational autoencoder (VAE) framework. We introduce the sparse coding variational autoencoder (SVAE), which augments the sparse coding model with a probabilistic recognition model parameterized by a deep neural network. This recognition model provides a neurally plausible feedforward implementation for the mapping from image patches to neural activities and enables a principled method for fitting the sparse coding model to data via maximization of the evidence lower bound (ELBO). The SVAE differs from standard VAEs in three key respects: the latent representation is overcomplete (there are more latent dimensions than image pixels), the prior is sparse or heavy-tailed instead of gaussian, and the decoder network is a linear projection instead of a deep network. We fit the SVAE to natural image data under different assumed prior distributions and show that it obtains higher test performance than previous fitting methods. Finally, we examine the response properties of the recognition network and show that it captures important nonlinear properties of neurons in the early visual pathway.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansModels, NeurologicalNeurons

Identifiers

PMID39383030
PMCPMC13377536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.