ArticleJournal of animal science2024
Transforming estimated breeding values from observed to probability scale: how to make categorical data analyses more efficient.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Control of Canalization for Twinning Rates in Polypay and Rambouillet Sheep Using Threshold or Double Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- National genomic evaluation for a novel functional longevity trait.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Methods for joint genetic prediction of multiple ordinal categorical and continuous traits.Genetics · 2026Article
- Genomic Prediction Ability Using Linear and Threshold Approaches for Different Stayability Definitions in Nellore Females.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- Comparison of linear and threshold models for genetic evaluation of morphological defects in Nellore cattle.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Estimation of genetic parameters for heifer pregnancy and carcass traits in angus cattle.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Scaling linear-model breeding values to the liability scale: an application to pig binary traits.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Beyond black and white: dissecting the genetic basis of skin depigmentation in Nellore cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Article
- Aligning phenotypic and genetic trends: comparing trends from threshold and linear models in pigs.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Genetic parameters for pelvic organ prolapse in purebred and crossbred sows.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Threshold models are often used in genetic analysis of categorical data, such as calving ease. Solutions in the liability scale are easily transformed into probabilities; therefore, estimated breeding values are published as the probability of expressing the category of main interest and are the industry's gold standard because they are easy to interpret and use for selection. However, because threshold models involve nonlinear equations and probability functions, implementing such a method is complex. Challenges include long computing time and convergence issues, intensified by including genomic data. Linear models are an alternative to overcome those challenges. Estimated breeding values computed using linear models are highly correlated (≥0.96) with those from threshold models; however, the lack of a transformation from the observed to the probability scale limits the use of linear models. The objective of this study was to propose transformations from observed to probability scale analogous to the transformation from liability to probability scale. We assessed computing time, peak memory use, correlations between estimated breeding values, and estimated genetic trends from linear and threshold models. With 11M animals in the pedigree and almost 965k genotyped animals, linear models were 5× faster to converge than threshold models (32 vs. 145 h), and peak memory use was the same (189 GB). The transformations proposed provided highly correlated probabilities from linear and threshold models. Correlations between direct (maternal) estimated breeding values from linear and threshold models and transformed to probabilities were ≥0.99 (0.97) for all animals in the pedigree, sires with/without progeny records, or animals with phenotypic records; therefore, estimated genetic trends were analogous, suggesting no loss of genetic progress in breeding programs that would adopt linear instead of threshold models. Furthermore, linear models reduced computing time by 5-fold compared to the threshold models; this enables weekly genetic evaluations and opens the possibility of using multi-trait models for categorical traits to improve selection effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.