Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39382979›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2024

Rat movements reflect internal decision dynamics in an evidence accumulation task.

Gary A Kane, Ryan A Senne, Benjamin B Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Regulation of the decision threshold by the locus coeruleus.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Embodied decisions as active inference.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatiotemporal dynamics of locomotor decisions inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Rapid, systematic updating of movement by accumulated decision evidence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gary A KaneDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-5055
Ryan A SenneGraduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3776-4576
Benjamin B ScottDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2741-7215

Funding

The Role of the Locus Coeruleus-Norepinephrine System in Flexible Decision-MakingR56MH132732 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SCOTT, BENJAMIN B · 2023 to 2024
$825k
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) R56MH132732NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH132732Whitehall Foundation (Whitehall Foundation, Inc.)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual decision-making involves multiple cognitive processes, including accumulation of sensory evidence, planning, and executing a motor action. How these processes are intertwined is unclear; some models assume that decision-related processes precede motor execution, whereas others propose that movements reflecting ongoing decision processes occur before commitment to a choice. Here we combine two complementary methods to study the relationship between decision processes and the movements leading up to a choice. The first is a free-response pulse-based evidence accumulation task, in which stimuli continue until choice is reported, and the second is a motion-based drift diffusion model (mDDM), in which movement variables from video pose estimation constrain decision parameters on a trial-by-trial basis. We find that the mDDM provides a better fit to rats' decisions in the free-response accumulation task than traditional drift diffusion models. Interestingly, on each trial we observed a period, before choice, that was characterized by head immobility. The length of this period was positively correlated with the rats' decision bounds, and stimuli presented during this period had the greatest impact on choice. Together these results support a model in which internal decision dynamics are reflected in movements and demonstrate that inclusion of movement parameters improves the performance of diffusion-to-bound decision models.

Indexed as

Decision MakingRats, Long-EvansAnimalsChoice BehaviorMaleModels, NeurologicalMotor ActivityMovementPsychomotor PerformanceRatsaccumulationdecision-makingmotion trackingresponse time

Identifiers

PMID39382979
PMCPMC11573272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.