ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2024
Rat movements reflect internal decision dynamics in an evidence accumulation task.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational mechanisms of perception in autism revealed using games inspired by rodent operant tasks.Science advances · 2026Article
- Regulation of the decision threshold by the locus coeruleus.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Diurnal rhythms of choice: a novel state-dependent drift diffusion model uncovers time-dependent changes in rat decision making.Research square · 2026Article
- Diurnal rhythms of choice: a novel state-dependent drift diffusion model uncovers time-dependent changes in rat decision making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Choice-induced preference change under a sequential sampling model framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Context-dependent activation of V1 parvalbumin interneurons enhances visual discrimination.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Embodied decisions as active inference.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Rapid, systematic updating of movement by accumulated decision evidence.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of locomotor decisions inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Rapid, systematic updating of movement by accumulated decision evidence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual decision-making involves multiple cognitive processes, including accumulation of sensory evidence, planning, and executing a motor action. How these processes are intertwined is unclear; some models assume that decision-related processes precede motor execution, whereas others propose that movements reflecting ongoing decision processes occur before commitment to a choice. Here we combine two complementary methods to study the relationship between decision processes and the movements leading up to a choice. The first is a free-response pulse-based evidence accumulation task, in which stimuli continue until choice is reported, and the second is a motion-based drift diffusion model (mDDM), in which movement variables from video pose estimation constrain decision parameters on a trial-by-trial basis. We find that the mDDM provides a better fit to rats' decisions in the free-response accumulation task than traditional drift diffusion models. Interestingly, on each trial we observed a period, before choice, that was characterized by head immobility. The length of this period was positively correlated with the rats' decision bounds, and stimuli presented during this period had the greatest impact on choice. Together these results support a model in which internal decision dynamics are reflected in movements and demonstrate that inclusion of movement parameters improves the performance of diffusion-to-bound decision models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.