ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Severity Stratification of Coronary Artery Disease Using Novel Inner Ellipse-Based Foveal Avascular Zone Biomarkers.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Modeling of Coronary Artery Disease Using Color Fundus Photography-Based Features of Retinal Vasculature.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- The value of retinal microvascular features in predicting risk stratification and long-term prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Ophthalmological Microvascular Changes in ANOCA/INOCA Disease and Ophthalmological Methods to Detect Them-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Superficial Retinal Intercapillary Oxygen Diffusion and Perfusion Deficit Alterations in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Coronary artery and retinal vascularization by optical coherence tomography angiography: are eyes the window to the heart?Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Given the similarities between the retinal and coronary microvasculature, the retina holds promising potential to serve as a non-invasive screening tool for coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to develop novel inner ellipse-based metrics and discern whether foveal avascular zone (FAZ) alterations can serve as indicators for CAD presence and severity. Methods: Patients admitted to the Department of Cardiology who underwent coronary angiography were included. This resulted in an inclusion of 212 patients, of which 73 had no CAD. During the same visit, 6 × 6-mm (nominal size) fovea-centered optical coherence tomography angiography images of both eyes were acquired. The Gensini score (GS) was utilized to quantify CAD severity. Six known FAZ shape metrics were assessed and three novel biomarkers based on the inner ellipse were defined: absolute inner ellipse difference, Hausdorff distance, and Chamfer distance. Results: Eight out of nine metrics showed significant associations with the GS in the left eye. However, significant differences across three CAD severity groups were only demonstrated by the novel metrics. Utilizing the Chamfer distance, age, and sex, patients with and without CAD could be distinguished with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.95). Moreover, three CAD severity groups could be discerned with a macro average AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84). Conclusions: A comprehensive assessment of FAZ shape descriptors was performed, and a strong association with CAD was found. The inner ellipse-based biomarkers especially demonstrated high predictive abilities for CAD presence and severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.