Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39382872›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Endpoints and Design for Clinical Trials in USH2A-Related Retinal Degeneration: Results and Recommendations From the RUSH2A Natural History Study.

Maureen G Maguire, David G Birch, Jacque L Duncan, Allison R Ayala, Lauren N Ayton, Janet K Cheetham, Peiyao Cheng, Todd A Durham, Frederick L Ferris, Carel B Hoyng and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical endpoints special session, ISCEV 2025, Utrecht.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Maureen G MaguireJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
David G BirchRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jacque L DuncanUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Allison R AyalaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Lauren N AytonUniversity of Melbourne, and Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Janet K CheethamFoundation Fighting Blindness, Columbia, MD, USA.
Peiyao ChengJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Todd A DurhamFoundation Fighting Blindness, Columbia, MD, USA.
Frederick L FerrisOphthalmic Research Consultants, Waxhaw, NC, USA.
Carel B HoyngRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Rachel M HuckfeldtMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Glenn J JaffeDuke Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Christine KayVitreoretinal Associates, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Eleonora M LadDuke Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Bart P LeroyGhent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wendi LiangJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Lee S McDanielJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Michele MeliaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Michel MichaelidesMoorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Mark E PennesiRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX, USA.
José-Alain SahelInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.
Lassana SamarakoonJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
REDI Working Group and the Foundation Fighting Blindness Clinical Consortium Investigator Group

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI John Peter Campbell · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Virus Production and Manipulation of Protein/Gene Expression ModuleP30EY008098 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Yuanyuan Chen · 1989 to 2026
$17.8M
Rapid-Prototyping and Design CoreP30EY002162 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ULLIAN, ERIK M · 1985 to 2024
$16.8M
Foundation Fighting Blindness RUSH2A - CONSORTIUM - 2016NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002162NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008098NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate functional and structural assessments as endpoints for clinical trials for USH2A-related retinal degeneration. Methods: People with biallelic disease-causing variants in USH2A, visual acuity ≥ 20/80, and visual field ≥ 10° diameter were enrolled in a 4-year, natural history study. Participants underwent static perimetry, microperimetry, visual acuity, fullfield stimulus testing (FST), and optical coherence tomography annually. Rates of change estimated from mixed-effects linear models and percentages of eyes with changes exceeding the coefficient of repeatability (CoR) or thresholds conforming with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines were evaluated. Results: Rates of change were generally more sensitive to change than proportions of eyes exceeding a threshold such as the CoR. Baseline ellipsoid zone area ≥ 3 mm2 was necessary to detect change. Mean sensitivity and volumetric hill of vision measures on static perimetry had similar properties and were the most sensitive to changes of the continuous measures. The highest 4-year proportions of eyes exceeding the CoR were from FST testing (47%) and microperimetry (32%). Specification of loci as functional transition points (FTPs) resulted in 45% (static perimetry) and 46% (microperimetry) at 4 years, meeting FDA guidelines for progression. Conclusions: Rate of change of mean sensitivity on static perimetry was a sensitive perimetric continuous measure. Percentages of within-eye change were largest with FST testing and microperimetry. FTPs appear to be particularly sensitive to change. These results affect clinical trial design for USH2A-related retinal degeneration. Translational Relevance: Analyses of natural history data from the Rate of Progression in USH2A-Related Retinal Degeneration (RUSH2A) study can inform eligibility criteria and endpoints for clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicExtracellular Matrix ProteinsRetinal DegenerationTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch DesignUsher SyndromesExtracellular Matrix ProteinsUSH2A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID39382872
PMCPMC11469320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.