Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39382851›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Three-dimensional radiation dosimetry of carbon ion beams using surfactant hydrogels: Fundamental investigation.

Masumitsu Toyohara, Yohsuke Kusano, Norihisa Kobayashi, Hiroaki Gotoh, Satoshi Wada, Yoshiaki Shimono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Masumitsu ToyoharaResearch Initiative and Promotion Organization, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan.
Yohsuke KusanoKanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Norihisa KobayashiDepartment of Chemistry and Life Science, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan.
Hiroaki GotohDepartment of Chemistry and Life Science, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan.
Satoshi WadaToshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation, Kawasaki, Japan.
Yoshiaki ShimonoToshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation, Kawasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn carbon ion radiotherapy, accurate measurement of the three-dimensional (3D) absorbed dose distribution is critical for effectively targeting tumors. Although micellar gel dosimeters exhibit considerable potential for measuring 3D absorbed dose distributions, few studies have focused on radiotherapy using carbon ion beams. PURPOSE: This study investigated the applicability of the surfactant hydrogel dosimeter (SHD), a micellar gel dosimeter, to measuring a 3D dose absorbed through carbon ion beam irradiation.

methodsA cubic target region of 34 mm per side was established at a depth of 46 mm below the upper surface of an SHD specimen. Scanning irradiation was performed using a pencil beam of carbon ions at the Ion-beam Radiation Oncology Center in Kanagawa ("i-ROCK"), Japan, under irradiation conditions set by the treatment planning system ("Monaco for Carbon", Ver. 5.20, Elekta AB, Sweden) to create a spread-out Bragg peak within the target. The physical dose was set to 10 Gy at the isocenter, situated at the center of the target. The SHD responsiveness was measured twice using optical computed tomography (CT) ("Vista 15", Modus Medical Devices, Canada) for three irradiated specimens, and six types of measured optical attenuation coefficient (OAC) were obtained. To assess whether the OAC represented the absorbed dose expected in the treatment plan, we compared the relative distribution of the OAC and that of the absorbed dose. Relative fraction (RF) was used to measure the difference between the relative value of the OAC and that of the absorbed dose. Moreover, the distribution of OH radical (•OH) concentration obtained by Monte Carlo simulation ("PHITS" ver. 3.24 JAEA, Japan) and that of the OAC were compared.

resultsIn the direction of beam travel, the relative distribution of the OAC was lower than that of the absorbed dose. This discrepancy could be attributed to a decrease in the concentration of •OH produced by irradiation owing to the recombination reaction, which does not accurately reflect the absorbed dose. By contrast, the distributions in the plane perpendicular to the beam travel were consistent. The RF increased from ± 3% to ± 13% along the beam travel direction. The small RF in the plane perpendicular to the beam travel could be attributed to the constant distribution of linear energy transfer, regardless of the irradiation position, and the generation of radicals proportionally to the absorbed dose. The increase in RF along the beam travel direction was ascribed to ring artifacts in the irradiated region.

conclusionThe measurement of the absorbed dose distribution in the beam travel direction should be improved. The observed discrepancy is attributed to the reduced reactivity of the SHD due to a high liner energy transfer near the Bragg peak. However, the absorbed dose distribution can be effectively evaluated in the plane perpendicular to the direction of beam travel.

Indexed as

Heavy Ion RadiotherapyHydrogelsRadiometrySurface-Active AgentsCarbonRadiotherapy DosageCarbonHydrogelsSurface-Active Agentsabsorbed dosecarbon ion beamOH radicaloptical attenuation coefficientoptical computed tomographyPHITSsurfactant hydrogel dosimeter

Identifiers

PMID39382851
PMCPMC11700004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.