Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39382836›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Design, construction, and use of a tapered-spiral, quadrature

Chang-Hoon Choi, Suk-Min Hong, Jörg Felder, Maximilian Bruch, Wieland A Worthoff, Sandra Krause, N Jon Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chang-Hoon ChoiInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Juelich, Germany.
Suk-Min HongInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Juelich, Germany.
Jörg FelderInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Juelich, Germany.
Maximilian BruchInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Juelich, Germany.
Wieland A WorthoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Juelich, Germany.
Sandra KrauseInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Juelich, Germany.
N Jon ShahInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine - 4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Juelich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn ovo MR presents a promising and viable alternative to traditional in vivo small animal experiments. Sodium MRI complements proton MRI by providing potential access to tissue cellular metabolism. Despite its abundance, sodium MRI is challenged by lower MR sensitivity and faster relaxation times compared to proton MRI. Ensuring a high signal-to-noise ratio and effective B PURPOSE: This study introduces a novel, highly optimized, double-tuned coil design, specifically for MR scans of chick embryos.

methodsA tapered-spiral, double-tuned coil was designed and constructed following careful consideration of design parameters. The performance of the coil was rigorously assessed through bench tests, and final validation was conducted on a 7 T MRI scanner using a chick embryo.

resultsBench tests demonstrated that the return losses for both

conclusionsThe innovative design of the proposed double-tuned coil, characterized by its unique arrangement, offers improved performance. This design has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of in ovo

Indexed as

Equipment DesignMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsChick EmbryoProtonsSignal-To-Noise RatioSodiumProtonsSodiumchick embryodouble‐tuned coildual‐tuned coilin ovoMRIsodiumX‐nuclei

Identifiers

PMID39382836
PMCPMC11656276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.