Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39382815›Full record

ReviewEmergency radiology2024

Multimodality imaging of coronary artery dissection: a pictorial essay.

Paola Sánchez, Sergio Vergara, Germán Carmona, Nicolás Bastidas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paola SánchezRadiologist at Fundación Clínica Shaio, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sergio VergaraRadiology Resident at Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Germán CarmonaRadiology Resident at Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Nicolás BastidasRadiology Resident at Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia. nicobasgu@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8561-8878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare and underdiagnosed entity that can lead to acute coronary syndrome. This condition has a gender predilection, predominantly affecting women, especially those with known risk factors such as pregnancy and the postpartum period. Hormonal changes and hemodynamic stress during these stages significantly contribute to the occurrence of SCAD. Recognizing and understanding this entity, as well as its imaging findings, have a favorable impact on patient prognosis. Accurate diagnosis through imaging techniques such as coronary angiography and computed tomography is crucial for the appropriate management of SCAD, allowing for early and specific interventions that can significantly improve clinical outcomes and reduce associated mortality. Continuous education and awareness about this condition are essential to improve detection rates and effective treatment.

Indexed as

Coronary Vessel AnomaliesMultimodal ImagingVascular DiseasesCoronary AngiographyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansAngiographyArtery dissectionCoronaryMRISpontaneous

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.