ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2024
The Rapidly Evolving Landscape of DCD Heart Transplantation.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beating heart transplantation: A single center's initial experience and propensity-matched analysis against national registry data.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Molecular and cellular adaptations to extended hypothermic oxygenated perfusion in donation-after-circulatory-death hearts in a porcine model.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Ex vivo hypothermic oxygenated perfusion allows extended heart preservation in a donation-after-circulatory-death porcine model.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Selective Angiography of Stimulant-Exposed Cardiac Donors Following Circulatory Death Does Not Impact Post-Transplant Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Differential Effects of Brain Death and Circulatory Death on Myocardial Integrity and Transplant Outcomes.Journal of surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo summarise current international clinical outcomes from donation after circulatory death heart transplantation (DCD-HT); discuss procurement strategies, their impact on outcomes and overall organ procurement; and identify novel approaches and future areas for research in DCD-HT. RECENT
findingsGlobally, DCD-HT survival outcomes (regardless of procurement strategy) are comparable to heart transplantation from brain dead donors (BDD). Experience with normothermic machine perfusion sees improvement in rates of primary graft dysfunction. Techniques have evolved to reduce cold ischaemic exposure to directly procured DCD hearts, though controlled periods of cold ischaemia can likely be tolerated. There is interest in hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) for directly procured DCD hearts, with promising early results. Survival outcomes are firmly established to be equivalent between BDD and DCD-HT. Procurement strategy (direct procurement vs. regional perfusion) remains a source of debate. Methods to improve allograft warm ischaemic tolerance are of interest and will be key to the uptake of HMP for directly procured DCD hearts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.