Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39382779›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2024

Camptothecin and its derivatives: Advancements, mechanisms and clinical potential in cancer therapy.

Madhu Kamle, Shikha Pandhi, Sadhna Mishra, Sreejani Barua, Anju Kurian, Dipendra Kumar Mahato, Prasad Rasane, Dietrich Büsselberg, Pradeep Kumar, Daniela Calina and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds and Their Therapeutic Potential in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Therapeutic potential of natural triterpenoids in liver cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Targeting glutamine metabolism as a potential target for cancer treatment.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Madhu KamleApplied Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Forestry, North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology, Nirjuli, India.
Shikha PandhiAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Sadhna MishraFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India.
Sreejani BaruaIndian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India.
Anju KurianDepartment of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Food Science, St. Aloysius College (Autonomous), Mangalore, 575003, India.
Dipendra Kumar MahatoCASS Food Research Centre, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.
Prasad RasaneDepartment of Food Technology and Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, 144411, India.
Dietrich BüsselbergWeill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, Qatar Foundation, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar.
Pradeep KumarDepartment of Botany, University of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India. pkbiotech@gmail.com.
Daniela CalinaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349, Craiova, Romania. calinadaniela@gmail.com.
Javad Sharifi-RadUniversidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, 092301, Ecuador. javad.sharifirad@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camptothecin (CPT), an alkaloid isolated from the Camptotheca tree, has demonstrated significant anticancer properties in a range of malignancies. However, its therapeutic efficacy is limited by its hydrophobicity, poor bioavailability, and systemic toxicity. Derivatives, analogues, and nanoformulations of CPT have been synthesized to overcome these limitations. The aim of this review is to comprehensively analyze existing studies to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, mechanistic aspects, and clinical potential of CPT and its modified forms, including derivatives, analogues, and nanoformulations, in cancer treatment. A comprehensive literature review was performed using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases; articles were selected based on specific inclusion criteria, and data were extracted on the pharmacological profile, clinical studies, and therapeutic efficacy of CPT and its different forms. Current evidence suggests that derivatives and analogues of CPT have improved water solubility, bioavailability, and reduced systemic toxicity compared to CPT. Nanoformulations further enhance targeted delivery and reduce off-target effects. Clinical trials indicate promising outcomes with enhanced survival rates and lower side effects. CPT and its modified forms hold significant promise as potent anticancer agents. Ongoing research and clinical trials are essential for establishing their long-term efficacy and safety; the evidence overwhelmingly supports further development and clinical testing of these compounds.

Indexed as

CamptothecinNeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiological AvailabilityHumansAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinAnticancer agentsCamptothecinClinical studiesDerivativesNanoformulationsPharmacological profile

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.