Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39382778›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Proof-of-concept study of a small language model chatbot for breast cancer decision support - a transparent, source-controlled, explainable and data-secure approach.

Sebastian Griewing, Fabian Lechner, Niklas Gremke, Stefan Lukac, Wolfgang Janni, Markus Wallwiener, Uwe Wagner, Martin Hirsch, Sebastian Kuhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Token-Level Attribution for Transparent Biomedical AI.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Chatbot To Help Patients Understand Their Health.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sebastian GriewingInstitute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany. s.griewing@uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5355-8903
Fabian LechnerInstitute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Niklas GremkeMarburg Gynecological Cancer Center, Giessen and Marburg University Hospital, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-3646
Stefan LukacDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-2267
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Markus WallwienerHalle Gynecological Cancer Center, Halle University Hospital, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Uwe WagnerMarburg Gynecological Cancer Center, Giessen and Marburg University Hospital, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Martin HirschInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sebastian KuhnInstitute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-2973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLarge language models (LLM) show potential for decision support in breast cancer care. Their use in clinical care is currently prohibited by lack of control over sources used for decision-making, explainability of the decision-making process and health data security issues. Recent development of Small Language Models (SLM) is discussed to address these challenges. This preclinical proof-of-concept study tailors an open-source SLM to the German breast cancer guideline (BC-SLM) to evaluate initial clinical accuracy and technical functionality in a preclinical simulation.

methodsA multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) is used as the gold-standard to assess the initial clinical accuracy in terms of concordance of the BC-SLM with MTB and comparing it to two publicly available LLM, ChatGPT3.5 and 4. The study includes 20 fictional patient profiles and recommendations for 5 treatment modalities, resulting in 100 binary treatment recommendations (recommended or not recommended). Statistical evaluation includes concordance with MTB in % including Cohen's Kappa statistic (κ). Technical functionality is assessed qualitatively in terms of local hosting, adherence to the guideline and information retrieval.

resultsThe overall concordance amounts to 86% for BC-SLM (κ = 0.721, p < 0.001), 90% for ChatGPT4 (κ = 0.820, p < 0.001) and 83% for ChatGPT3.5 (κ = 0.661, p < 0.001). Specific concordance for each treatment modality ranges from 65 to 100% for BC-SLM, 85-100% for ChatGPT4, and 55-95% for ChatGPT3.5. The BC-SLM is locally functional, adheres to the standards of the German breast cancer guideline and provides referenced sections for its decision-making.

conclusionThe tailored BC-SLM shows initial clinical accuracy and technical functionality, with concordance to the MTB that is comparable to publicly-available LLMs like ChatGPT4 and 3.5. This serves as a proof-of-concept for adapting a SLM to an oncological disease and its guideline to address prevailing issues with LLM by ensuring decision transparency, explainability, source control, and data security, which represents a necessary step towards clinical validation and safe use of language models in clinical oncology.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicProof of Concept StudyArtificial intelligenceBreast cancerClinical oncologyLarge language modelSmall language model

Identifiers

PMID39382778
PMCPMC11464535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.