ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024
Segmentation-based quantitative measurements in renal CT imaging using deep learning.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age, Sex, and Laterality-Based Evaluation of Renal Volume and Surface Area Using CT-Based Three-Dimensional Segmentation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating kidney imaging for risk prediction, therapeutic monitoring, and prognostication across the kidney disease spectrum: a review of emerging evidence.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Photon-counting computed tomography enables low-dose, high-quality abdominal imaging: A comparative study with energy-integrating detector computed tomography.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRenal quantitative measurements are important descriptors for assessing kidney function. We developed a deep learning-based method for automated kidney measurements from computed tomography (CT) images.
methodsThe study datasets comprised potential kidney donors (n = 88), both contrast-enhanced (Dataset 1 CE) and noncontrast (Dataset 1 NC) CT scans, and test sets of contrast-enhanced cases (Test set 2, n = 18), cases from a photon-counting (PC)CT scanner reconstructed at 60 and 190 keV (Test set 3 PCCT, n = 15), and low-dose cases (Test set 4, n = 8), which were retrospectively analyzed to train, validate, and test two networks for kidney segmentation and subsequent measurements. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The quantitative measurements' effectiveness was compared to manual annotations using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
resultsThe contrast-enhanced and noncontrast models demonstrated excellent reliability in renal segmentation with DSC of 0.95 (Test set 1 CE), 0.94 (Test set 2), 0.92 (Test set 3 PCCT) and 0.94 (Test set 1 NC), 0.92 (Test set 3 PCCT), and 0.93 (Test set 4). Volume estimation was accurate with mean volume errors of 4%, 3%, 6% mL (contrast test sets) and 4%, 5%, 7% mL (noncontrast test sets). Renal axes measurements (length, width, and thickness) had ICC values greater than 0.90 (p < 0.001) for all test sets, supported by narrow 95% confidence intervals.
conclusionTwo deep learning networks were shown to derive quantitative measurements from contrast-enhanced and noncontrast renal CT imaging at the human performance level. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep learning-based networks can automatically obtain renal clinical descriptors from both noncontrast and contrast-enhanced CT images. When healthy subjects comprise the training cohort, careful consideration is required during model adaptation, especially in scenarios involving unhealthy kidneys. This creates an opportunity for improved clinical decision-making without labor-intensive manual effort. KEY POINTS: Trained 3D UNet models quantify renal measurements from contrast and noncontrast CT. The models performed interchangeably to the manual annotator and to each other. The models can provide expert-level, quantitative, accurate, and rapid renal measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.