Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39382745›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Lymphatic Surgery Center.

Zachary J Eisner, Christine S W Best, Jayna Lenders, Geoffrey E Hespe, Paige L Myers, Theodore A Kung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zachary J EisnerUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christine S W BestDepartment of Surgery, The University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jayna LendersUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Geoffrey E HespeDepartment of Surgery, The University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Paige L MyersDepartment of Surgery, The University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Theodore A KungDepartment of Surgery, The University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. thekung@med.umich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondary lymphedema has become an increasingly common reason for referral to plastic surgery. Understanding referral patterns for lymphedema patients is crucial to optimizing care. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients referred to plastic surgery for lymphedema at a lymphatic surgery center between January 2016 and 2023 were identified. Primary outcomes of interest included clinical lymphedema staging and characteristics, patient demographics, and referral sources. Secondary outcomes were prior lymphedema treatment, agreement between referring provider and plastic surgeon's diagnosis, and patient disposition after surgical evaluation. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.

resultsA total of 285 patients with extremity edema were referred to plastic surgery; 60.0% of patients had prior malignancy, 45.6% of patients had undergone a prior lymph node procedure, and 40% had received radiation, while 56.8% of patients had previously seen occupational therapy. Body mass index (BMI, OR 1.09, p = 0.013), age (OR 1.25, p = 0.005), and prior physical or occupational therapy (OR 1.23, p = 0.011) were associated with later stages of lymphedema upon presentation, while prior radiation (OR 0.79, p = 0.006) and malignancy (OR 0.85, p = 0.034) were associated with earlier stages of lymphedema. Self-referral (27.4%), primary care (17.9%), and medical oncology (14.7%) were the most common referral sources. Lymphedema was confirmed in 68.1% of referrals, and 28.5% of these patients proceeded to surgery. Patients were more likely to be operative candidates if referred by primary care (RR 2.1, p = 0.006) or occupational therapy (RR 4.6, p = 0.010).

conclusionsReferred patients ultimately undergo lymphedema surgery at relatively low rates, indicating that most referred patients are not ideal surgical candidates. Optimizing referral patterns through multidisciplinary education may enhance the referral process and improve access to lymphedema surgery.

Indexed as

LymphedemaReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care Centers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.