ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024
Validation of a multi-parameter algorithm for personalized contrast injection protocol in liver CT.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver enhancement using rapid kVp-switching dual-energy CT with reduced iodine contrast dose compared with single-energy CT with standard iodine dose: an intra-patient comparison.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT combined with contrast-enhanced MRI for colorectal liver metastases: a case-control study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn liver computed tomography (CT), tailoring the contrast injection to the patient's specific characteristics is relevant for optimal imaging and patient safety. We evaluated a novel algorithm engineered for personalized contrast injection to achieve reproducible liver enhancement centered on 50 HU.
methodsFrom September 2020 to August 31, 2022, CT data from consecutive adult patients were prospectively collected at our multicenter premises. Inclusion criteria consisted of an abdominal CT referral for cancer staging or follow-up. For all examinations, a web interface incorporating data from the radiology information system (patient details and examination information) and radiographer-inputted data (patient fat-free mass, imaging center, kVp, contrast agent details, and imaging phase) were used. Calculated contrast volume and injection rate were manually entered into the CT console controlling the injector. Iopamidol 370 mgI/mL or Iohexol 350 mgI/mL were used, and kVp varied (80, 100, or 120) based on patient habitus.
resultsWe enrolled 384 patients (mean age 61.2 years, range 21.1-94.5). The amount of administered iodine dose (gI) was not significantly different across contrast agents (p = 0.700), while a significant increase in iodine dose was observed with increasing kVp (p < 0.001) and in males versus females (p < 0.001), as expected. Despite the differences in administered iodine load, image quality was reproducible across patients with 72.1% of the examinations falling within the desirable range of 40-60 HU.
conclusionThis study validated a novel algorithm for personalized contrast injection in adult abdominal CT, achieving consistent liver enhancement centered at 50 HU. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In healthcare's ongoing shift towards personalized medicine, the algorithm offers excellent potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient management, particularly for the detection and follow-up of liver malignancies. KEY POINTS: The algorithm achieves reproducible liver enhancement, promising improved diagnostic accuracy and patient management in diverse clinical settings. The real-world study demonstrates this algorithm's adaptability to different variables ensuring high-quality liver imaging. A personalized algorithm optimizes liver CT, improving the visibility, conspicuity, and follow-up of liver lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.