ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024
Clinical application of an optimized reference measurement procedure for serum digoxin using bracketing calibration method by ID-LC-MS/MS.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digoxin, a cardiac glycoside, is widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Due to its narrow therapeutic range, precise monitoring of its blood concentration is essential. A reference measurement procedure (RMP) is pivotal for ensuring result accuracy and comparability. The RMP for serum digoxin by ID-LC-MS/MS was optimized with sample pre-treatment and detection processes, and the bracketing calibration method was used, which facilitates more accurate measurement, especially for extreme concentrations. The performance of this optimized RMP was thoroughly evaluated. The limit of detection (LoD) was 0.05 ng/mL (0.06 nmol/L) and the lowest limit of quantification (LLoQ) was 0.10 ng/mL (0.13 nmol/L). The intra- and inter-assay imprecisions were 2.24%, 2.51%, 1.40% and 1.72%, 1.65%, 0.97% at 0.5, 2.0, 5.0 ng/mL, respectively. Recoveries were 99.63 to 101.42% and the linear response ranged from 0.1 to 10.0 ng/mL. The relative bias was 0.41% and 2.00% of our results compared with the median of all participating reference laboratories for IFCC-RELA (External Quality Assessment Scheme for Reference Laboratories in Laboratory Medicine) 2023A and 2023B. The uncertainty, calibration and measurement capability (CMC) of this method were also evaluated. The optimized RMP was applied in the Trueness Verification Plan of Southern China, which indicates significant differences among clinical systems, highlighting the need for standardization efforts. In addition, two commonly used clinical systems which employed immunoassay methods were compared with this optimized RMP, and 26 individual serum samples were analyzed. The good correlations indicate the feasibility of standardization for serum digoxin. The optimized RMP serves as an accurate reference baseline for routine methods, aiming to enhance the accuracy and precision of measurements in clinical laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39382675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.