ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
Near-infrared autofluorescence pattern in parathyroid gland adenoma.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of PTeye™ versus FLUOBEAM® LX for parathyroid adenomas: a pilot case-control study.Updates in surgery · 2025Trial
- Research status and frontier trends of near-infrared autofluorescence for parathyroid identification and protection: a bibliometric analysis from 2006 to 2026.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Indocyanine green fluorescence in parathyroidectomy: enhancing efficiency through real-time adenoma identification.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- A mediastinal eosinophilic adenoma misdiagnosed as an esophageal stromal tumor: A case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParathyroid gland (PG) surgery is often challenging due to the small size and indistinct nature of these glands. The introduction of intraoperative near-infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) has shown promise in localizing parathyroid tissue. However, the NIRAF features of parathyroid adenomas remain unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the NIRAF pattern of parathyroid adenomas.
methodsPatients who underwent surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism at the University Hospital of Pisa, Endocrine Surgery Unit, between December 2021 and February 2022 were enrolled in this study. Intraoperative NIRAF patterns of suspected parathyroid adenomas were evaluated, with particular attention given to the presence of a bright cap.
resultsA retrospective study was conducted on 11 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy at our institution. Histopathological examination of the 15 resected specimens confirmed 14 parathyroid adenomas (12 chief cell parathyroid adenomas, 1 oxyphil cell parathyroid adenoma, and 1 mixed cell parathyroid adenoma) and one schwannoma. All adenomas exhibited a heterogeneous NIRAF pattern, distinct from the homogeneous pattern observed in the schwannoma. A bright cap was identified in 9 out of 14 (64.3%) parathyroid adenomas (all chief cell adenomas). On the contrary, all 9 macroscopically normal PGs identified during surgery presented an homogeneous pattern.
conclusionOur findings support the integration of NIRAF into parathyroid surgical procedures. The heterogeneous NIRAF pattern observed in parathyroid adenomas, often accompanied by a bright cap, offers a promising intraoperative diagnostic tool to differentiate hyperfunctioning from normal parathyroid tissue. Larger-scale randomized trials are warranted to further validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.