Functional outcome and histologic analysis of late onset total type brachial plexus injury treated with intercostal nerve transfer to median nerve with local umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells or secretome injection: a double-blinded, randomized control study.

introductionIntercostal nerve transfer is a surgical technique used to restore function in patients with total brachial plexus injury. Stem cell and secretome therapy has been explored as a potential treatment for brachial plexus injuries. This study aimed to compare the functional and histologic outcome of intercostal nerve transfer to median nerve with local stem cells or secretome injection in total type brachial plexus injuries. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a double-blinded, randomized controlled study (RCT). We included patients with neglected total type brachial plexus injury (BPI) who underwent nerve transfer and local injection of either umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC) or secretome into median nerve-flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) neuromuscular junction (NMJ). We measured preoperative and 8-month postoperative FDS muscle strength, SF-36, DASH score, and histologic assessment. We then analyzed the difference outcome between those two groups.

resultA total of 15 patients were included in this study. Our study found that after nerve transfer and implantation with either UC-MSC or secretome, significant postoperative improvements were observed in physical functioning, role limitations, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, general health, and DASH scores, particularly in the overall cohort and the secretome group. When we compared the mean difference of clinical outcome from preoperative to postoperative between UC-MSC and secretome groups, the UC-MSC group showed better improvement of health change in SF-36 subgroup compared to secretome group. From the analysis, there was no significant difference in the histologic outcomes (inflammation, regeneration, and fibrosis) in overall cohort between preoperative and postoperative cohort. There was also no significant difference in mean change of the histologic outcomes (inflammation, regeneration, and fibrosis) preoperative and postoperatively between UC-MSC and secretome groups. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionImplantation of either UC-MSC or secretome along with nerve transfer may provide clinical improvement, while to achieve histologic improvement, further conditioning should be performed.