ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
The ASPECT hydrocephalus system: investigating clinical applicability and system utility.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overnight Dynamics of Ventricular Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-Beta, Lactate and Hypocretin in Patients With Hydrocephalus: A Pilot Study.Journal of sleep research · 2026Observational
- Analysis of craniospinal hydrodynamics in infants with hydrocephalus after preterm intraventricular hemorrhage.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHydrocephalus presents diagnostic and management challenges due to its heterogeneity. The ASPECT Hydrocephalus System, introduced in 2023, offers a comprehensive approach to describing patients with hydrocephalus. This study investigates the clinical applicability of the ASPECT Hydrocephalus System compared to the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) and demonstrates its utility.
methodsTwo hundred pediatric and adult patients with hydrocephalus treated at Copenhagen University Hospital between September 2019 and 2020 were described according to the ASPECT Hydrocephalus System. The latest brain imaging served as assessment point.
resultsForty-seven percent of patients had more than one ICD-10 code assigned, and 40.5% of patients had an unspecific ICD-10 code as the most recent. It was possible to apply factor A (anatomy), S (symptomatology), P (previous interventions), C (complications) and T (time of onset) to all patients. Factor E (etiology) categorized 15% of patients as 'unknown'. Combining factor A and S showed a similar incidence of acute high-pressure symptoms in patients with and without ventriculomegaly on imaging (39.7% vs 39.3%), demonstrating how symptoms and neuro-radiological findings do not necessarily correlate.
conclusionThe ASPECT Hydrocephalus System's applicability and utility were demonstrated in a large, diverse patient population. Except for 'Etiology', all factors could be applied to the entire population showing the system's robustness. While limitations in ICD-10 may force clinicians to choose between clinical measures, the ASPECT Hydrocephalus System allows comprehensive patient characterization, potentially aiding in clinical decision-making and research. Its use depends on registration quality. Application in prospective cohorts is warranted to assure feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.