ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2024
Covert airflow obstruction dominates the overt ones in interstitial lung disease: An appraisal.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives The co-presence of non-emphysematous airflow obstruction in interstitial Lung disease (ILD) is not elaborated. The present study aims the job with spirometry. Methods ILD affected individuals with or without airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC<0.7 or >0.7) on spirometry were compared in terms of FEV1 and FEF25-75 derived variables [FEF25-75 (%-predicted), FEV1-FEF25-75 distance, reversibility of FEV1 and FEF25-75 to salbutamol and change in FEV1 and FEF25-75 in %-predicted values]. Those showing significant difference (P=0.0001) suggesting obstruction were selected to draw respective receiver operating curve (ROC) curves to identify the best cut-off value for individual parameters. The efficacy of each surrogate was tested to identify airflow obstruction in both the initial 'overlap' as well as the 'unmixed' ILD affected individual for the presence of airflow obstruction. Results FEV1/FVC identified 30 overlap from 235 ILDs. The FEF25-75 (%-predicted), FEV1-FEF25-75 distance, FEF25-75 reversibility (in ml) and FEV1 (%-predicted) were significantly (P<0.0001) different between the two groups. Of these, the FEF25-75 (%-predicted) had high specificity and sensitivity (93.33 and 79.47%) to identify airflow limitation in the initial unmixed ILD-group. The surrogates with their cut off values identified 92 extra individuals making it 122/235 (51.91%) of ILD having airflow obstruction. The 'unmixed' group showed higher frequency and degree of FEV1 reversibility. Interpretation & conclusions The findings of this study suggest that the airflow obstruction in ILD involves both the intrathoracic large and small airways. Although seemingly parallel, their relative status (qualitative and quantitative) needs research especially in light of the a etio pathology and the extent of involvement of ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.