ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
Sequence-Based Machine Learning Reveals 3D Genome Differences between Bonobos and Chimpanzees.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning reveals sequence and genomic context features underlyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Adaptive loss of function accelerated the evolution of ancient and modern human cognition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- In silico genome transplants and the cis-regulatory basis of biodiversity.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- enhancer3D: 3D chromatin structures and enhancer-promoter distance profiles for archaic and modern human genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Reconstructing the 3D genome organization of Neanderthals reveals that chromatin folding shaped phenotypic and sequence divergence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrating Intermediate Traits in Phylogenetic Genotype-to-Phenotype Studies.Integrative and comparative biology · 2025Review
- Divergent 3D genome organization in livers of cave and surface morphs ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Reveals the Diversity of Human 3D Chromatin Contact Patterns.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Machine learning reveals the diversity of human 3D chromatin contact patterns.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 3D structure of the genome is an important mediator of gene expression. As phenotypic divergence is largely driven by gene regulatory variation, comparing genome 3D contacts across species can further understanding of the molecular basis of species differences. However, while experimental data on genome 3D contacts in humans are increasingly abundant, only a handful of 3D genome contact maps exist for other species. Here, we demonstrate that human experimental data can be used to close this data gap. We apply a machine learning model that predicts 3D genome contacts from DNA sequence to the genomes from 56 bonobos and chimpanzees and identify species-specific patterns of genome folding. We estimated 3D divergence between individuals from the resulting contact maps in 4,420 1 Mb genomic windows, of which ∼17% were substantially divergent in predicted genome contacts. Bonobos and chimpanzees diverged at 89 windows, overlapping genes associated with multiple traits implicated in Pan phenotypic divergence. We discovered 51 bonobo-specific variants that individually produce the observed bonobo contact pattern in bonobo-chimpanzee divergent windows. Our results demonstrate that machine learning methods can leverage human data to fill in data gaps across species, offering the first look at population-level 3D genome variation in nonhuman primates. We also identify loci where changes in 3D folding may contribute to phenotypic differences in our closest living relatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.