SynthesisNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025
Effectiveness and Experience of Implementing Digital Interventions to Promote Smoking Cessation Among Adults With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the Hospital Discharge Gap: Pilot Trial of a Digital Smoking Cessation Program for Psychiatric Inpatients.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Trial
- Quitline Queensland: the journey to a globally unique smoking cessation service in Australia.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDigital technology is increasingly used to support interventions targeting smoking cessation in people with severe mental illness (SMI). However, little is known about their implementation and effectiveness in this population. We aimed to determine the effectiveness, stakeholder experiences, factors influencing implementation, and quality of reporting of digital interventions for smoking cessation in adults living with SMI.
methodsFive online bibliographic databases were searched for articles published between December 31, 2000 and January 31, 2023. Studies involving adults accessing treatment for alcohol and substance use disorders, neurocognitive disorders, and terminal illnesses were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A Mantel-Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. Participant experience and intervention implementation were explored using a narrative synthesis. Quality of reporting of interventions was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist.
resultsThirty-one studies enrolling 3794 participants were included. Meta-analysis of biochemically verified abstinence at longest follow-up (month 1 to month 6) did not find an overall effect in favour of intervention (risk ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval = -0.005 to 1.37). Interventions tailored to people with SMI were perceived as acceptable. Implementation strategies concentrated on overcoming practical challenges at the participant/user level.
conclusionsNo evidence of the effectiveness of digital interventions to support smoking cessation in people with SMI was found. The importance of tailoring interventions to the needs of people with SMI is highlighted. Robust reporting of implementation is required to enhance future efforts to support smoking cessation in adults with SMI. IMPLICATIONS: The findings of this review add to the emerging evidence on digital interventions to support smoking cessation among people with SMI. We highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to the population, particularly considering the role of mental illness and the side effects of psychotropic medication in the accessibility and usability of digital interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.