SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2025
The Role of Language in Remote Healthcare Triage: A Meta-Aggregative Review.
Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIM(S): To provide an overview of evidence on the role of language in remote healthcare services prioritisation, from now on termed triage. This study synthesises literature, to better understand how language affects triage interactions, aiming to improve these processes.
designWe conducted a meta-aggregative review.
methodsA systematic search in Scopus from inception to September 2023 identified 437 studies on language in remote healthcare triage, of which 23 were included. Information was selected using both inductive and deductive coding, focusing on six linguistic features of interaction that have been described in the literature on studies using conversation analysis: turn-taking organisation, overall structure, sequence organisation, turn design, lexical choice, and epistemological and other forms of asymmetry. The process followed the RAMESES Publication Standards for Meta-narrative Reviews.
resultsTwo main findings emerged. First, all six linguistic features are present in triage conversations, indicating that language involves more than just what is said. It also matters, for example, how and when a question is asked. Second, computerised decision support systems (CDSS) significantly affect conversation flow and dynamics.
conclusionLanguage in triage involves more than literal speech and is heavily influenced by CDSS. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Our study suggests that quality assessments of triage conversations should consider not only what is said but cover all relevant aspects of language. The influence of computerised decision support systems (CDSS) on linguistic features highlights the need for systems to be adaptable, to improve conversation quality and better addressing caller needs rather than focusing on one-size-fits-all questions. IMPACT: This review highlights the complex role of language in triage conversations and its impact on interaction. It calls for a broader view of language in quality assessments, recognising that both call-takers and callers contribute to call quality. Insights from this review can help developers enhance question types, sequence, and delivery methods of computerised decision support systems. Finally, education for call-takers in healthcare sectors may be improved based on our findings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.