ArticlemBio2024
Emergent ecology in a microscale model of the surface ocean.
Article in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diel study reveals increased nighttime bacterial activity and its connection to organic compounds in the ocean.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial processes operate at the microscale, which is not resolved by existing ecosystem models. Here, we present a novel model that simulates a 1 mL three-dimensional cube using a hybrid Lagrangian-Eulerian approach, at ecologically relevant timescales. The model simulates individual microbes, including three phytoplankton size classes with healthy, senescent, and dead lifecycle stages; copiotrophic and oligotrophic heterotrophic bacteria; and dissolved organic matter at 50 µm resolution. Diffusion, shear, sedimentation, chemotaxis, and attachment processes are explicitly resolved. The emerging quantitative representation of the ecosystem shows that (1) copiotrophs grow mostly attached to eukaryotic phytoplankters and get almost all of their carbon from them vs. oligotrophs that grow on exudates and lysates of cyanobacteria; (2) contrasting diel patterns in substrate appearance in the phycosphere vs. ambient water and growth of particle-associated copiotrophs vs. free-living oligotrophs; (3) attached bacteria reduce carbon flux from the phycosphere, lowering chemotactic efficiency toward eukaryotes below that toward cyanobacteria; (4) shear reduces chemotactic efficiency and fitness of the copiotroph; and (5) the main benefit of chemotaxis is to locate attachment partners. These patterns are consistent with available observations. Our study provides insights into the microscale ecology of marine bacteria, and the open-source code is a tool for further research in this area.IMPORTANCEA large amount of global CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.