Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39382260›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Exploring the Utility of the Modified Hospitalized-Patient One-Year Mortality Risk Score to Trigger Referrals to Palliative Care for Inpatients With Cancer.

A Ghoshal, R Prince, J Downar, J Lapenskie, S Subramaniam, P Wegier, L W Le, B Hannon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early integration or last consultation: in-house palliative care involvement for hospitalized patients in tertiary medicine-a retrospective analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A GhoshalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-2568
R PrinceEpworth Cancer Services Clinical Institute, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
J DownarDepartment of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J LapenskieOttawa Hospital Research Institute and Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
S SubramaniamHumber River Health, North York, Ontario, Canada.
P WegierHumber River Health, North York, Ontario, Canada.
L W LeDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
B HannonPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimating prognosis can be a barrier to timely palliative care involvement. The modified Hospitalized-patient One-year Mortality Risk (mHOMR) score uses hospital admission data to calculate the risk of death within 12 months and may be a useful tool to trigger a referral to palliative care.

methodsThe mHOMR tool was retrospectively applied to consecutive acute admissions to a quaternary cancer center in Toronto, Canada from March 1 to May 31, 2018. The study aimed to investigate the association between dichotomized mHOMR scores (the cohort median score of 0.27 and the developer-recommended score of 0.21) and the risk of death, and whether these could be used to identify patients who may benefit from timely palliative care involvement.

resultsOf 269 inpatients, 87 were elective admissions and excluded from further analyses. At the median mHOMR score of 0.27, 91/182 patients (50%) were categorized as high-risk of death within 12 months (mHOMR+), 53 (58%) were referred to palliative care. At the lower cut-off of 0.21, 103 patients were mHOMR+, of whom 57 (55.3%) were referred to palliative care. The higher mHOMR was significantly associated with mortality (29.7% mHOMR- vs. 39.8% mHOMR+ at 12 months, log-rank p < 0.05). The association between the developer-recommended mHOMR cut-off (≥ 0.21) and mortality was not significant (p = 0.15).

conclusionsA higher mHOMR score was significantly associated with the risk of mortality in patients with advanced cancer. However, the developer-recommended mHOMR cut-off of 0.21 failed to identify a statistically significant difference between patients with advanced cancer at low versus high scores. While mHOMR may be a useful tool to augment clinical judgment and identify inpatients with advanced cancer at high risk of death, who in turn may benefit from referral to palliative care, the optimal mHOMR cutoff may warrant adjustment for this population.

Indexed as

HospitalizationNeoplasmsPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentclinical decision‐makingpalliative careprognosisscoringsupportive care

Identifiers

PMID39382260
PMCPMC11462593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.