ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024
Clinical relevance of paramagnetic rim lesion heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging of Tissue Microstructure and Early Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Automated Detection and Burden Assessment of Paramagnetic Rim Lesions on Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Paramagnetic rim lesions are highly specific for multiple sclerosis in real-world data.Brain communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePrevious studies reveal heterogeneity in terms of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) associated tissue damage. We investigated the physiopathology and clinical implications of this heterogeneity.
methodsIn 103 MS patients (72 relapsing and 31 progressive), brain lesions were manually segmented on 3T 3D-FLAIR and rim visibility was assessed with a visual confidence level score (VCLS) on 3D-EPI phase. Using T1 relaxation time maps, lesions were categorized in long-T1 and short-T1. Lesion age was calculated from time of first gadolinium enhancement (N = 84 lesions). Results on clinical scores were validated in an extended cohort of 167 patients using normalized T1w-MPRAGE lesion values.
resultsRim visibility (VCLS analysis) was associated with increasing lesional T1 (P/P
interpretationPRL show substantial heterogeneity in terms of intralesional tissue damage. More destructive, likely older, long-T1 PRL improve the association with MS clinical scales. This PRL heterogeneity characterization was replicated using standard T1w MRI, highlighting its potential for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.