Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381842›Full record

ArticleClinical oral implants research2025

A Cross-Sectional Study of Peri-Implant Diseases in a Random Norwegian Population: Prevalence, Risk Indicators, and Clinical Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Erik Klepsland Mauland, Karoline Sørensen, Naomi Østergren Aarbu, Anders Verket, Stig Aanerød Ellingsen, Vibeke Hervik Bull, Roya Torabi Gaarden, Stein Atle Lie, Dagmar Fosså Bunæs

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erik Klepsland MaulandDepartment of Periodontology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5386-0176
Karoline SørensenDepartment of Periodontology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Naomi Østergren AarbuDepartment of Periodontology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anders VerketDepartment of Periodontology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4862-9030
Stig Aanerød EllingsenOral Health Competence Center Nord-Norge, Tromsø, Norway.
Vibeke Hervik BullOral Health Competence Center, Haugesund/Stavanger, Norway.
Roya Torabi GaardenOral Health Competence Center Midt-Norge, Trondheim, Norway.
Stein Atle LieDepartment of Periodontology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Dagmar Fosså BunæsDepartment of Periodontology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

ITI Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe primary aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of peri-implant diseases in a randomly selected Norwegian population. The secondary aims were to explore risk indicators for peri-implant diseases and to validate self-reported outcome measures from a survey with clinical parameters. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients (n = 3083) rehabilitated with dental implants in 2014 were mailed a questionnaire and invited to a clinical examination. A randomly selected subset of responders underwent a clinical examination (n = 242). Full mouth clinical and radiographic examinations were conducted. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess patient-related risk indicators for peri-implantitis. Self-reported data were compared with data from the clinical examination using Spearman correlation and binary logistic regression.

resultsThe prevalence of peri-implantitis was 17.0% at patient level and 8.6% at implant level, according to the 2018 classification. Risk indicators for peri-implantitis included smoking and periodontitis in the adjusted model. The correlation was strong (r = 0.91, p < 0.001) between number of self-reported implants and clinical counts, whereas self-reported peri-implant inflammation was associated with peri-implantitis (OR 6.4 [95% CI 3.0, 13.7]).

conclusionsSmoking and periodontitis were identified as key risk indicators for peri-implantitis. Questionnaire data rendered clinically valid estimates of implant number, and self-reported peri-implant inflammation was associated with clinical peri-implantitis.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPeri-ImplantitisAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPeriodontitisPrevalenceRisk FactorsSelf ReportSmokingDental Implantscross‐sectional studiesdental implantsperi‐implantitisprevalencerisk factorsvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID39381842
PMCPMC11810557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.