ArticleDigital health
Multitask learning to predict successful weaning in critically ill ventilated patients: A retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Codes in AI Prediction Models and Label Leakage of Same-Admission Clinical Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Article
- Predicting Do-Not-Resuscitate Decisions in Critically Ill Patients Through Using Multitask Learning: A Retrospective Study of the MIMIC-IV Database.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Weaning is an essential issue in critical care. This study explores the efficacy of multitask learning models in predicting successful weaning in critically ill ventilated patients using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database. Methods: We employed a multitask learning framework with a shared bottom network to facilitate common knowledge extraction across all tasks. We used the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) plot and partial dependence plot (PDP) for model explainability. Furthermore, we conducted an error analysis to assess the strength and limitation of the model. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration plot and decision curve analysis were used to determine the performance of the model. Results: A total of 7758 critically ill patients were included in the analyses, and 78.5% of them were successfully weaned. Multitask learning combined with spontaneous breath trial achieved a higher performance to predict successful weaning compared with multitask learning combined with shock and mortality (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, AUROC, 0.820 ± 0.002 vs 0.817 ± 0.001, Conclusion: We demonstrated that multitask machine learning increased predictive accuracy for successful weaning through combining tasks with a high inter-task relationship. The model explainability and error analysis should enhance trust in the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.