Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381828›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Multitask learning to predict successful weaning in critically ill ventilated patients: A retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.

Ming-Yen Lin, Hsin-You Chi, Wen-Cheng Chao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ming-Yen LinDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3180-3132
Hsin-You ChiDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung.
Wen-Cheng ChaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-8934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Weaning is an essential issue in critical care. This study explores the efficacy of multitask learning models in predicting successful weaning in critically ill ventilated patients using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database. Methods: We employed a multitask learning framework with a shared bottom network to facilitate common knowledge extraction across all tasks. We used the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) plot and partial dependence plot (PDP) for model explainability. Furthermore, we conducted an error analysis to assess the strength and limitation of the model. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration plot and decision curve analysis were used to determine the performance of the model. Results: A total of 7758 critically ill patients were included in the analyses, and 78.5% of them were successfully weaned. Multitask learning combined with spontaneous breath trial achieved a higher performance to predict successful weaning compared with multitask learning combined with shock and mortality (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, AUROC, 0.820 ± 0.002 vs 0.817 ± 0.001, Conclusion: We demonstrated that multitask machine learning increased predictive accuracy for successful weaning through combining tasks with a high inter-task relationship. The model explainability and error analysis should enhance trust in the model.

Indexed as

Critical careerror analysisinterpretabilitymultitask learningweaning

Identifiers

PMID39381828
PMCPMC11459496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.