Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381817›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Enhancing the prediction of the invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinomas presenting as pure ground-glass nodules: Integrating intratumor heterogeneity score with clinical-radiological features via machine learning in a multicenter study.

Hong Zheng, Wei Chen, Wanyin Qi, Haibo Liu, Zhichao Zuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hong ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, PR China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province, Brain Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, PR China.
Wanyin QiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, PR China.
Haibo LiuDepartment of Radiology, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, PR China.
Zhichao ZuoSchool of Mathematics and Computational Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, PR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4824-6138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma significantly impacts clinical decision-making. However, assessing this invasiveness preoperatively, especially when it manifests as pure ground-glass nodules (pGGN) on CT scans, poses challenges. This study aims to quantify intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) and determine whether the ITH score can enhance the accuracy of invasiveness predictions. Methods: A total of 524 patients with lung adenocarcinomas presenting as pGGN were enrolled in the study, with 177 (33.78%) receiving a pathologic diagnosis of invasiveness. Four diagnostic approaches were developed to predict the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma presenting as pGGN: (1) conventional lesion size, (2) ITH score, (3) clinical-radiological features (ClinRad), and (4) integration of the ITH score with ClinRad. ClinRad alone or in combination with the ITH score served as the input for 11 machine learning approaches. The trained models were evaluated in an independent validation cohort, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess classification performance. Results: The conventional lesion size showed the lowest performance, with an AUC of 0.826 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.758-0.894), while the ITH score outperformed it with an AUC of 0.846 (95% CI: 0.787-0.905). The CatBoost model performed best when the ITH score and ClinRad were both used as input features, leading to the development of an ITH-ClinRad-guided CatBoost classifier. CatBoost also excelled with ClinRad alone, resulting in a ClinRad-guided CatBoost classifier with an AUC of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.764-0.896), surpassed by the ITH-ClinRad-guided CatBoost classifier with an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.818-0.924). Conclusion: The ITH-ClinRad-guided CatBoost classifier emerges as a promising tool with significant potential to revolutionize the management of lung adenocarcinomas presenting as pGGNs.

Indexed as

Intratumor heterogeneityinvasivenessmachine learningpulmonary adenocarcinomapure ground-glass nodule

Identifiers

PMID39381817
PMCPMC11459516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.