ArticleDigital health
Brain tumor classification using fine-tuned transfer learning models on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- ETDACVO: Structural-Fidelity-Aware Evolutionary Co-Optimization for Robust and Explainable Brain Tumor MRI Classification.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- A contrastive learning framework with adaptive feature fusion for brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Computer-aided diagnosis of neonatal acute bilirubin encephalopathy with multi-modal MRI images and convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Robust ConvNeXt-Based Framework for Efficient, Generalizable, and Explainable Brain Tumor Classification on MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Classification of Temporal Stages of AT8-Labeled Tau Pathology After Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- A machine learning model for diabetic retinopathy risk stratification using routine blood and urine parameters: insights into kidney-eye crosstalk.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Convolutional neural networks in brain disease diagnosis: a unified review of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and brain tumor classification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Bridging modalities: a deep learning framework for brain tumor classification via CT-MRI integration and model fusion.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- A Study on the Performance Comparison of Brain MRI Image-Based Abnormality Classification Models.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A deep ensemble learning framework for brain tumor classification using data balancing and fine-tuning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced ResNet-50 with Multi-Feature Fusion for Robust Detection of Pneumonia in Chest X-Ray Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging Prior Knowledge in a Hybrid Network for Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques on the BraTS dataset for brain tumor classification.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A hybrid cardiovascular arrhythmia disease detection using ConvNeXt-X models on electrocardiogram signals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- ACU-Net: Attention-based convolutional U-Net model for segmenting brain tumors in fMRI images.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Brain tumors are a leading global cause of mortality, often leading to reduced life expectancy and challenging recovery. Early detection significantly improves survival rates. This paper introduces an efficient deep learning model to expedite brain tumor detection through timely and accurate identification using magnetic resonance imaging images. Methods: Our approach leverages deep transfer learning with six transfer learning algorithms: VGG16, ResNet50, MobileNetV2, DenseNet201, EfficientNetB3, and InceptionV3. We optimize data preprocessing, upsample data through augmentation, and train the models using two optimizers: Adam and AdaMax. We perform three experiments with binary and multi-class datasets, fine-tuning parameters to reduce overfitting. Model effectiveness is analyzed using various performance scores with and without cross-validation. Results: With smaller datasets, the models achieve 100% accuracy in both training and testing without cross-validation. After applying cross-validation, the framework records an outstanding accuracy of 99.96% with a receiver operating characteristic of 100% on average across five tests. For larger datasets, accuracy ranges from 96.34% to 98.20% across different models. The methodology also demonstrates a small computation time, contributing to its reliability and speed. Conclusion: The study establishes a new standard for brain tumor classification, surpassing existing methods in accuracy and efficiency. Our deep learning approach, incorporating advanced transfer learning algorithms and optimized data processing, provides a robust and rapid solution for brain tumor detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.