Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381807›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Digital health literacy: A concept analysis.

Suyeon Ban, Yirang Kim, GyeongAe Seomun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Social listening for the identification of information voids on early childhood caries based on Google search data.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suyeon BanCollege of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yirang KimCollege of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
GyeongAe SeomunCollege of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1651-5741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To elucidate the concept of digital health literacy by delineating its primary dimensions, origins and effects. Through this clarification, we seek to augment our understanding of the contemporary use of the concept of digital health literacy. Methods: Rodgers's concept analysis was employed to investigate digital health literacy as a context-influenced concept evolving with technological progress. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, RISS, KISS and DBpia) and Google Scholar were searched from 2006 to 2023, focusing on the terms 'digital health literacy', 'eHealth literacy' and 'mHealth literacy'. Of 2,819 papers, 32 were included in the analysis to identify the conceptual structure of digital health literacy. Results: The conceptual structure of digital health literacy was identified, and its evolution was traced. Currently, the four critical attributes are (a) goal-driven regulation, (b) information processing, (c) communication and (d) utilisation. Functional literacy, prior health knowledge and experience, and access to technology are antecedents, while positive health outcomes, increased perceived control and enhanced health-related quality of life emerged as consequences. Additionally, the concept was influenced by multilevel contextual factors. Conclusions: By enhancing our understanding of digital health literacy; standardising its terminology; and exploring the interactions among its antecedents, consequences and influencing factors, this study aims to reduce health disparities and promote equitable health in the digital era. The results of this foundational work, which establishes a basis for future research and policy development, provide clear pathways for developing targeted interventions and measurement tools of digital health literacy, ultimately contributing to better health practices.

Indexed as

concept analysisdigital healthDigital health literacyeHealtheHealth literacyhealthcare disparitieshealth inequitiessocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39381807
PMCPMC11459536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.