ArticleOTO open
Variability of the Microbiota in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Scoping Review.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3-oxo-C12HSL-induced apoptosis involves bitter taste receptor T2R14 and the mitochondrial calcium uniporter.Cell calcium · 2026Article
- Chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps: the state-of-the-art of current treatment strategies and future developments.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is characterized by a persistent inflammation of the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa that could be potentially linked to a dysregulation between the microbiota and the immune system. We aim to explore general, methodological, and microbiological aspects of microbiota research in CRS compared to disease-free individuals. Data Sources: Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Review Methods: All studies comparing the composition of the resident microbiota of the sinonasal cavities in 2 groups: CRS and normal participants. We conducted systematic study selection, data extraction, and analysis first using the title and abstract, and then the full texts based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compiled and presented findings include sampling site and technique, and microbiological results such as the relative abundance and the variability of the composition of the microbiota in both groups. Results: Twenty-seven studies, using genomic identification with 16s RNA were analyzed. Case definitions primarily followed EPOS or AAO-HNS guidelines, with endoscopic swabs (82%), and middle meatus sampling (74%) being prevalent techniques. Despite relative abundance variability, patterns emerged across studies, indicating an increase in Conclusion: While variations exist among studies, analysis of CRS microbiota suggests an association with dysbiosis, potentially contributing to chronic inflammation. Future research must prioritize standardized criteria for diagnostics and patient selection, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of CRS microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.