Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381769›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the media health literacy questionnaire (MeHLit-SV).

Noelia Navas-Echazarreta, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Antonio Martínez-Sabater, Vicente Gea-Caballero, Elena Chover-Sierra, Emmanuel Echaniz-Serrano, Regina Ruiz de Viñaspre-Hernández, Blanca Jodrá-Esteban, Pilar Sánchez-Conde, María Teresa Fernández-Rodrigo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Noelia Navas-EchazarretaDoctoral Program in Health Sciences and Sports, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain.
Raúl Juárez-VelaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Antonio Martínez-SabaterFaculty of Nursing, Nursing Care and Education Research Group (GRIECE), GIUV2019-456, Nursing Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Vicente Gea-CaballeroFaculty of Health Sciences, Research Group Community Health and Care, Valencian International University, Valencia, Spain.
Elena Chover-SierraFaculty of Nursing, Nursing Care and Education Research Group (GRIECE), GIUV2019-456, Nursing Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Emmanuel Echaniz-SerranoSAPIENF (B53_23R) Research Group, Department of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Regina Ruiz de Viñaspre-HernándezFaculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Blanca Jodrá-EstebanFaculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Pilar Sánchez-CondeHospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
María Teresa Fernández-RodrigoSAPIENF (B53_23R) Research Group, Department of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Antonio Rodríguez-CalvoHospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Pedro José Satústegui-DordáSAPIENF (B53_23R) Research Group, Department of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Media health literacy emerges as a response to the vast array of informational disorders prevalent in media communications. Given the absence of a measurement tool for this type of literacy in Spanish-speaking communities, the aim of the present study is to conduct a cross-cultural adaptation of the Media Health Literacy (MeHLit) questionnaire into Spanish and to analyze its psychometric properties in a sample of nursing students. Methods: The Spanish version of the MeHLit questionnaire (MeHLit-SV) was obtained through a process involving translation, back-translation, evaluation of the proposed items by a group of 22 experts, and a pilot study with 80 Spanish nursing students. Content validity was assessed using each item's content validity index (CVI) and Aiken's V (VdA), while internal consistency was evaluated through Cronbach's Alpha. Results: Following the translation and adaptation process, the final version of the MeHLit-SV comprised 21 items organized into five dimensions. The CVI values exceeded 0.82 for all items, and the overall content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.9. Furthermore, the results of Aiken's V surpassed the threshold considered acceptable (0.70). After piloting, the questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.936. Conclusion: The findings of this research support the reliability and validity of the MeHLit-SV for use among nursing students to measure their level of media health literacy. This questionnaire, with satisfactory psychometric properties and ease of administration, is an useful tool for assessing whether individuals possess the necessary skills to accurately analyze health information they encounter on a daily basis.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPsychometricsStudents, NursingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMass MediaPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsYoung Adultcross-cultural adaptationmedia health literacymedia literacypsychometric validationquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID39381769
PMCPMC11458485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.