ArticleReumatologia2024
Biopsychosocial conditions of patients in the rheumatology department of a university hospital.
Article in Reumatologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim was to examine biopsychosocial conditions of patients hospitalized in the rheumatology department of a university hospital. Material and methods: Ninety-six patients (mean age: 53.14 ±16.83 years) receiving inpatient treatment at the rheumatology service of a university hospital were included. Chest circumference, manual muscle testing, general well-being (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS), the Fatigue Severity Scale, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Nottingham Health Profile were used for evaluation. Results: The average number of days hospitalized was 15.57 ±15.11. Mean disease duration was 7.91 ±9.34 years. Respiratory rate per minute was 22.55 ±6.03. Chest circumference measurement at rest was 97.01 ±9.70 cm, inspiration was 99.71 ±9.67 cm, expiration was 94.10 ±13.91 cm. Quadriceps muscle strength (on a scale of 0-5) was 4.26 ±0.74 on the right and 4.16 ±0.76 on the left; biceps brachii muscle strength was 4.46 ±0.64 on the right and 4.39 ±0.78 on the left. The VAS score was 6.03 ±2.51; the Rivermead Mobility Index was 11.41 ±4.11; the Nottingham Health Profile total score was 39.18 ±22.44; the energy level sub-score was 52.89 ±37.06. History of previous hospitalization was found in 42 patients (43.8%). Five patients (5.2%) were at bed level, 4 patients (4.2%) were at sitting level, 7 patients (7.3%) were at standing level, and 80 patients (83.3%) were at walking level. Seventeen patients (17.7%) used assistive devices for mobilization. Sixty-one patients (63.5%) were fatigued, and 21 patients (21.9%) had moderate anxiety. Conclusions: Inspiratory capacity of patients hospitalized in rheumatology service is low. Their respiratory rate is higher than the normal value. Their mobility and energy levels are at average values while fatigue and anxiety levels need to be considered. In addition to pharmacological treatments, we recommend that patients hospitalized in rheumatology service be supported by appropriate exercises provided by physiotherapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.