Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381723›Full record

ArticleReumatologia2024

Radiological measurement of posterior tibial subluxation as a preoperative factor in choosing the type of implant in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Dawid Jegierski, Bartosz Michał Maciąg, Krystian Żarnovsky, Tomasz Kordyaczny, Maciej Świercz, Grzegorz Jan Maciąg, Artur Stolarczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reumatologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dawid JegierskiDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Międzyleski Specialist Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-8341
Bartosz Michał MaciągDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Międzyleski Specialist Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0311-3735
Krystian ŻarnovskyDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Międzyleski Specialist Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5176-9165
Tomasz KordyacznyDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Międzyleski Specialist Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5245-5184
Maciej ŚwierczDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Międzyleski Specialist Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3829-760X
Grzegorz Jan MaciągDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Międzyleski Specialist Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0091-8308
Artur StolarczykDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Międzyleski Specialist Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-8153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most effective treatment of late osteoarthritis (OA) and is considered among the most successful surgical procedures in general. However, about 20% of patients remain dissatisfied. An important aspect of TKA is the proper choice of implant type - posterior stabilized (PS) or cruciate retaining (CR). Both have their indications for use based on intraoperative functional examination, but no objective radiological criteria have yet been developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the posterior subluxation of the tibia on preoperative radiograms and implant type used. Material and methods: A series of 52 patients undergoing TKA were included in the study. All patients were over 50 years old, had clinically and radiologically confirmed primary OA of grade IV on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale and were undergoing a primary total knee replacement (TKR) with a PS or CR design. Preoperative lateral radiographs were analysed retrospectively. The tibial translation ratio was calculated as a percentage of subluxation in the length of the tibial plateau. Results: There were no significant differences between implant types in regard to investigated parameters. However, there was a significant difference between the groups CR and PS in regard to age (68.5 [60.0-72.0] vs. 72.5 [68.0-75.0], Conclusions: This study revealed that preoperative tibial translation does not significantly correlate with the choice of implant type and so probably not with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) function and efficiency either. Additionally, this study showed that PCL insufficiency is related to the age of the patients, because of the more frequent choice of the PS implant type for the surgery in older patients than in the case of the CR implant type.

Indexed as

osteoarthritisposterior cruciate ligamentsubluxationtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39381723
PMCPMC11457310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.