ArticleF&S reports2024
Progesterone in frozen embryo transfer cycles: assays, circulating concentrations, metabolites, and molecular action.
Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioequivalence study of Prontogest 100 mg/2 mL solution for intramuscular injection versus reference progesterone injection, USP 500 mg/10 mL under fasting conditions: a randomized, open-label, two-sequence, four-period, fully replicated crossover study in healthy postmenopausal women.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Optimizing the Endometrial Factor in Recurrent Implantation Failure: From Established Diagnostics to Mechanism-Informed Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Serum progesterone concentration in frozen embryo transfer preparation: how (and if) we should measure it.F&S reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Programmed or medicated frozen embryo transfer cycles rely on exogenous progesterone (P) administration to prepare the endometrium for implantation and maintain pregnancy. Presently, the optimal route and dose of P replacement for frozen embryo transfer are not known. In addition, there is a paucity of data and insufficient understanding regarding the metabolism and actions of P in implantation and pregnancy maintenance. In the present review, we discuss how different P assay methodologies affect the determination of P thresholds for implantation and pregnancy maintenance. In addition, we discuss the importance of free P and its regulation in the endometrium and show the complexity of molecular signaling that is required for P-dependent endometrial receptivity. We concluded that future studies should focus on defining accurate circulating and endometrial P concentrations, both for total and free P, and how these concentrations correlate with endometrial receptivity and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.