ArticleF&S reports2024
Initially categorized 46,XY embryo transfer ending with 45,X products of conception-a case report and a review of discordant result management.
Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Misdiagnosis of different types of aneuploidy in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Pooled it
- Construction and validation of a preimplantation kinship identification model using ultra-low-depth whole genome sequencing.iScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To report a case of an initially categorized euploid male embryo screened using preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) resulting in miscarriage and testing of products of conception consistent with Turner syndrome, and to discuss additional workup and considerations in cases of discrepancy. Design: Case report. Setting: University fertility clinic. Intervention: Frozen single embryo transfer of a euploid male embryo. Patients: A couple seeking procreative management for a female partner having a balanced translocation 46,XX,t(14;16)(q21;q21) diagnosed after the couple's previous child passed because of segmental duplication in chromosomes 14 and 16 and pursued in vitro fertilization treatment for PGT for structural rearrangements. Main Outcome Measures: Miscarriage with discordant chromosomal microarray result. Results: Couple conceived with the transfer of a euploid male embryo. After the initial confirmation of pregnancy, repeat imaging indicated a missed abortion. Dilation and curettage were performed, and the products of conception were sent for chromosomal microarray. Results indicated Turner syndrome (45,X). Follow-up short tandem repeat analysis confirmed the products of conception were from the tested embryo. After reevaluation of the data, copy number variations below the reporting threshold for the sex chromosomes were observable and compatible with mosaic 45,X/46,XY. Conclusions: The limitations of PGT should be kept in mind when counseling patients because of both the sample provided by biopsy, the sequencing platforms and the laboratory pipeline for diagnosis. We recommend that patients be counseled about these limitations and offered antenatal and postnatal testing as indicated. When discrepancies are seen after PGT, collaboration with the reference laboratory and additional testing with short tandem repeat analysis should be considered when possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.