ArticleF&S reports2024
Transvaginal radiofrequency ablation: a therapeutic option for managing symptomatic uterine fibroids in women with reproductive desires.
Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Management of Uterine Fibroids.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of an intramural fibroid in a woman desiring fertility with coexisting focal adenomyosis: a case report.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of Transvaginal Radiofrequency Ablation for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictors of ≥50% volume reduction after radiofrequency ablation of uterine fibroids: a single-center retrospective case series in Romania.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Transvaginal Uterine Fibroid Radiofrequency Ablation (TV-RFA): Retrospective Analysis and Preliminary Report.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether transvaginal radiofrequency (RF) ablation of fibroids is a technique that can be offered to women with reproductive desires. Design: Unicentric, prospective, observational study. Setting: University Hospital. Patients: Twenty-seven individuals who desired to become mothers after undergoing RF ablation for symptomatic fibroids. Interventions: Transvaginal RF ablation for symptomatic fibroids with a maximum total volume of 145 cm Main Outcome Measures: The reduction in the size of the fibroids, improvement of symptoms, and reproductive outcomes during the 24 months after the ablation. For patients who achieved pregnancy, we assessed the type of conception, course of gestation, type of delivery, neonatal outcomes, and occurrence of both maternal and fetal complications. Results: A statistically significant reduction in symptoms related to the fibroids 6 months after the ablation was demonstrated through the implementation of the Symptom Severity Scale. No patient required hospitalization after the procedure, and on average from the third day after intervention, they resumed their work activities without the need for analgesics. Among those patients who attempted pregnancy during the 24-month follow-up period, 73.68 % (14/19) achieved motherhood. There were no cases of uterine rupture, premature birth, or intrauterine fetal death. Conclusions: Radiofrequency ablation for fibroids seems to be a promising, safe, and low-complexity alternative that does not appear to interfere with the development of a normal term gestation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.