ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024
Immunological responses to brain metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery in patient-matched longitudinal blood and tumour samples.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergy of radiotherapy, focused ultrasound, and immunotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- A feasibility trial of delayed resection for brain metastases following pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of stereotactic radiosurgery timing relative to immune checkpoint blockade administration on brain metastasis disease and radionecrosis outcomes.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is highly effective as focal treatment for brain metastases (BrMs), but whether it can promote anti-tumour immune responses that synergise with immunotherapy remains unclear. We investigated this by examining blood samples from a clinical trial for HER2-amplified breast cancer (HER2-BC) BrMs, matched with longitudinal HER2-BC BrM samples resected from the same location in the same patient. Methods: Blood samples from 10 patients taken pre- and 7-14 days post-SRS were analysed by mass and flow cytometry. One patient received pre-operative SRS for a BrM that recurred 7 months after resection, followed by planned re-resection 8 days post-SRS. Pre- and post-SRS tumours from this patient were analysed by bulk RNAseq, multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC), and TCR sequencing. Results: Monocytes, central memory CD8+ T and regulatory T cells were enriched in blood post-SRS, together with increased MHC-II expression on monocytes, conventional DCs, and monocytic MDSCs. In tumour, SRS upregulated antigen presentation, T cell proliferation and T cell co-stimulation signatures, alongside an influx of tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) and CD4+ T cells. Specifically, TAMs and CD4+ T cells, but not CD8+ T cells, demonstrated spatial co-localisation post-SRS. These TAMs were lowly PD-L1 expressing, but CD4+ T cells showed increased PD-1 expression. A sizeable proportion of T cell clonotypes were retained post-SRS, and four clones demonstrated significant, non-stochastic expansion. Conclusion: Systemic and local immunological changes in this homogenous patient cohort suggest that SRS may facilitate MHC-II-restricted T cell priming responses involving the monocyte-macrophage lineage and CD4+ T cells, which should be further explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.