Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381562›Full record

ArticleJournal of field archaeology2024

Integrating and Dividing in a Late Bronze Age Society: Internal Organization of Settlements of the Tisza Site Group in the Southern Carpathian Basin, 1600-1200 b.c.

Caroline Bruyère, Barry Molloy, Dragan Jovanović, Miroslav Birclin, Jugoslav Pendić, Gordana Topić, Lidija Milašinović, Neda Mirković-Marić, Aleksandar Šalamon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of field archaeology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caroline BruyèreUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8929-1313
Barry MolloyUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2493-8859
Dragan JovanovićCity Museum of Vršac, Vršac, Serbia.
Miroslav BirclinNational Museum of Pančevo, Pančevo, Serbia.
Jugoslav PendićBioSense Institute, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Gordana TopićProvincial Institute for Protection of Cultural Monuments, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Lidija MilašinovićNational Museum of Kikinda, Kikinda, Serbia.
Neda Mirković-MarićIntermunicipal Institute for the Heritage Protection, Subotica, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7531-9361
Aleksandar ŠalamonNational Museum of Zrenjanin, Zrenjanin, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research in the later Bronze Age of the southern Carpathian Basin has revealed an extensive network of large, often-enclosed settlements. Within this network, a particularly dense group of sites has recently been characterized: the Tisza Site Group (TSG). Building on advances in inter-site relations in recent research, we explore social organization within settlements using five case studies from different parts of this network. Using a multi-proxy approach of satellite imagery, systematic surface survey, and geophysical prospection, we studied the distribution of archaeological features and surface traces of activity within the enclosed space. Results indicate that sites in the TSG shared a common ethos regarding the use of space and the role of the built environment that was specific to LBA occupation of this landscape. Activity areas with domestic assemblages distributed in low-density relative to the enclosed space indicates settlement and specialist subsistence activities took place in parallel.

Indexed as

Carpathian BasingeophysicsLate Bronze Agesettlementssurface survey

Identifiers

PMID39381562
PMCPMC11458129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.