ArticleCentral-European journal of immunology2024
Comparison of cytotoxicity methods for studying
Article in Central-European journal of immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Venom ofVeterinary sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alternative in vitro tests that can be used instead of animal experiments are those that can most closely evaluate the biological activity of the drug of interest. For testing the potency of antivenom, these are the methods used to assess cytotoxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the most commonly used cytotoxicity methods for determining the protective potency of the antivenom Viekvin, which neutralizes Vipera ammodytes venom. Material and methods: The selected methods are based on different biological mechanisms: MTT assay, based on the activity of cell oxidoreductase enzymes; crystal violet staining, based on the degree of cell adhesion; trypan blue staining, based on cell membrane permeability, and propidium iodide staining, based on measurement of nucleic acids of dead cells. The pro-apoptotic effect of the venom was also determined with annexin V staining. Results: The IC Conclusions: We concluded that the choice of the method used to measure the anticytotoxic anti-venom potency depends on the immunogenicity of the venom components that cause cell death; for each venom/antivenom pair, it is necessary to select the appropriate assay separately, and at present, none of the standard cytotoxic methods can be universally applied to determine antivenom potency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.