ReviewCureus2024
Revolutionizing Neonatal Care: A Comprehensive Review of Intact Cord Resuscitation in Newborns.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Delayed Cord Clamping Saves Newborn Lives.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal resuscitation is a critical procedure aimed at ensuring the successful transition of newborns from intrauterine to extrauterine life. Traditionally, this involves immediate clamping and cutting of the umbilical cord, but recent advances have introduced intact cord resuscitation (ICR) as an alternative approach. This review aims to comprehensively analyze ICR, exploring its evolution, scientific basis, and clinical evidence. It seeks to evaluate the benefits and challenges associated with ICR and assess its impact on neonatal outcomes compared to traditional practices. A thorough review of the literature was conducted, including historical perspectives on neonatal resuscitation, the physiological rationale behind ICR, and critical clinical studies and trials. Current guidelines and recommendations were also examined, along with technological advancements and practical implementation issues. Evidence indicates that ICR offers significant benefits, including improved blood volume, better cardiovascular stability, and reduced risk of anemia in newborns. Comparative studies suggest that ICR can enhance neonatal outcomes and support a smoother transition to extrauterine life. Despite these benefits, challenges related to implementation and adherence to new practices persist. ICR represents a promising advancement in neonatal care, potentially improving newborns' health outcomes. Continued research and refinement of guidelines are necessary to fully integrate ICR into standard practice and address existing implementation challenges. This review highlights the need for ongoing evaluation and adaptation of resuscitation practices to optimize neonatal health and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.