ReviewCureus2024
Impact of Guided Endodontics on the Success of Endodontic Treatment: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classification proposal of obliterated canals based on the position of the target point and the caliber of the root canal.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2026Article
- Static-Guided Endodontics for Complex Intracanal Obstructions and Zirconia Post Removal: Report on Three Cases.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Guided Endodontic Management of Orthodontic-Induced Canal Calcification Using Static Guide: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Failure of Guided Endodontic Access in a Severely Obliterated Root Canal: A Case Report of Drill Deviation.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Guided Endodontic Technique in Mandibular Incisors with Pulp Canal Obliteration: A Case Report.Iranian endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Custom Sleeve Parameters in Static Guided Endodontic Access: Influence on Deviation Control in Pulp Canal Obliteration.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endodontic treatment, essential for preserving teeth affected by pulp or periapical diseases, often encounters challenges such as complex root canal anatomies and calcifications that can hinder success. Traditional techniques, although effective, are limited in addressing these complexities. Guided endodontics, which utilizes advanced imaging and navigation technologies, promises enhanced accuracy and precision, potentially improving treatment outcomes. Thus, this umbrella review aims to assess whether guided endodontics influences the outcome of endodontic treatment by synthesizing evidence from multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies. Additionally, grey literature was searched. The umbrella review protocol was developed and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42024564150). Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs), randomized clinical trials, case series, and case reports. Exclusion criteria included reviews, non-English language articles, in vitro studies, ex vivo studies, randomized experimental (in vitro) studies, narrative reviews, and expert opinions. Studies involving patients undergoing guided endodontic treatment with dynamic and static navigation systems were included. The interventions aimed at improving the accuracy and precision of endodontic procedures, particularly in challenging cases such as locating calcified canals and performing microsurgery. The study involved three reviewers who independently appraised the systematic reviews for eligibility, data extraction, and review quality. The quality of the systematic reviews was evaluated using the "A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2" (AMSTAR2) assessment tool. The methodological quality of the systematic reviews was assessed. A pooled review of the studies showed that guided endodontics demonstrated more precise and better results than conventional endodontic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.