ArticleCureus2024
Improving Blood Transfusion Request Form Documentation: A Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe transfusion quality improvement project (QIP) serves as a valuable tool for assessing and educating individuals who request blood components.
methodsA prospective study was conducted at Al Managil Teaching Hospital, Sudan, from May 1 to August 3, 2024, to address the lack of standardized transfusion request forms. The study included three cycles involving pre-intervention analysis, two phases of intervention with training sessions, and post-intervention evaluations. The interventions focused on developing and implementing a new transfusion request form, training clinical physicians, and reinforcing the form's use. Data from 100 randomly selected transfusion request forms were analyzed for completeness and adherence.
resultsThe study showed significant improvements in the completeness of transfusion request forms across three cycles. In the first cycle, no data were collected, highlighting the absence of standardized forms. During the second cycle, with the introduction of the new form, the completion rates varied: some fields, such as patient information and clinical details, were fully completed in 50 cases (100%), while critical clinical parameters, such as current hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (PLT) levels, were completed in only four requests (8%). By the third cycle, there was a substantial increase in completion rates across all domains. For example, patient information fields achieved 100% completion in 50 cases, and clinical parameters saw significant improvement, with current Hb and PLT levels documented in 48 cases (96%). The mean percentage completion increased from 68.1% in the second cycle to 97.9% in the third cycle, demonstrating the effectiveness of the interventions and training sessions. Minor decreases were observed in health insurance documentation and certain clinical details, indicating areas for further improvement.
conclusionThe systematic implementation and iterative evaluation of transfusion request forms significantly enhanced documentation completeness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.