ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Is Intravenous Access Necessary in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Ophthalmologic Examinations Under Anesthesia? A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anesthesia Strategies for Pediatric Ophthalmic Patients: Systematic Review of Recent Advances and Updates.Current ophthalmology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Ophthalmologic examinations under anesthesia (EUA) were employed in pediatric patients due to lower cooperation levels and associated discomfort during comprehensive eye examinations. There remains uncertainty regarding the necessity of intravenous (IV) placement during general anesthesia. The primary aim of the study is to investigate the impact of general anesthesia, with and without IV access, on operation time in pediatric patients undergoing EUA. Secondary objectives include assessing cardiovascular and respiratory complications and measuring parental satisfaction in both the IV and No IV groups. Patients and Methods: This prospective observational analytic study, conducted as a cross-sectional study, took place between October 2019 and October 2020, in Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. We included healthy pediatric patients aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective ambulatory EUA. Results: Eighty-two patients, with 41 in the IV group and 41 in the No IV group, were enrolled and included for analysis. The No IV group showed a significantly shorter median operation time (7.99 (6.63, 9.36) minutes) compared to the IV group (10.9 (9.05, 12.28) minutes), with a median difference of -2.74 minutes (95% CI -3.76, -1.69, Conclusion: Providing general anesthesia for EUA without IV access in healthy pediatric patients, leading to shorter operation times and heightened parental satisfaction, can be conducted safely. Clinical Trial Registration Number: The trial registration number is TCTR20191021001 from the Thai Clinical Trials Registry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.