Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381407›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2022

Probabilistic deconvolution of PET images using informed priors.

Thomas Mejer Hansen, Klaus Mosegaard, Søren Holm, Flemming Littrup Andersen, Barbara Malene Fischer, Adam Espe Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas Mejer HansenDepartment of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Klaus MosegaardPhysics of Ice, Climate and Earth, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren HolmDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Flemming Littrup AndersenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Barbara Malene FischerDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adam Espe HansenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We present a probabilistic approach to medical image analysis that requires, and makes use of, explicit prior information provided by a medical expert. Depending on the choice of prior model the method can be used for image enhancement, analysis, and segmentation. Methods: The methodology is based on a probabilistic approach to medical image analysis, that allows integration of 1) arbitrarily complex prior information (for which realizations can be generated), 2) information about a convolution operator of the imaging system, and 3) information about the noise in the reconstructed image into a posterior probability density. The method was demonstrated on positron emission tomography (PET) images obtained from a phantom and a patient with lung cancer. The likelihood model (multivariate log-normal) and the convolution operator were derived from phantom data. Two examples of prior information were used to show the potential of the method. The extended Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, was used to generate realizations of the posterior distribution of the tracer activity concentration. Results: A set of realizations from the posterior was used as the base of a quantitative PET image analysis. The mean and variance of activity concentrations were computed, as well as the probability of high tracer uptake and statistics on the size and activity concentration of high uptake regions. For both phantom and in vivo images, the estimated images of mean activity concentrations appeared to have reduced noise levels, and a sharper outline of high activity regions, as compared to the original PET. The estimated variance of activity concentrations was high at the edges of high activity regions. Conclusions: The methodology provides a probabilistic approach for medical image analysis that explicitly takes into account medical expert knowledge as prior information. The presented first results indicate the potential of the method to improve the detection of small lesions. The methodology allows for a probabilistic measure of the size and activity level of high uptake regions, with possible long-term perspectives for early detection of cancer, as well as treatment, planning, and follow-up.

Indexed as

deconvolutionPETpositron emission tomographyprobabalistic approachquantitativestatistical

Identifiers

PMID39381407
PMCPMC11459987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.