Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381392›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2024

The Role of Vascularized Nerve Grafting in Upper Extremity Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Helia Hosseini, Fortunay Diatta, Neil Parikh, Alna Dony, Catherine T Yu, Elijah Persad-Paisley, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Elspeth Jane Rose Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helia HosseiniDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Fortunay DiattaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Neil ParikhDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Alna DonyDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Catherine T YuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Elijah Persad-PaisleyThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Johnny Chuieng-Yi LuDivision of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Elspeth Jane Rose HillDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Vascularized nerve grafts (VNGs) have been proposed as encouraging alternatives to conventional nerve grafting; however, there is ongoing debate regarding the clinical advantages of the approach compared with standard grafting. This review aims to gather and analyze reported cases of upper extremity nerve repair using VNGs documented in the published literature. Methods: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched. Inclusion criteria for this review included the following: (1) human subjects or cadaveric studies, (2) describing a vascularized nerve grafting procedure or suggesting a nerve and vascular supply for a potential vascularized nerve graft, and (3) upper extremity nerve repair in clinical studies. Results: Data were extracted from 45 clinical studies. Of 535 patients, the most common injury pattern was root avulsion and rupture (88.7%). The most utilized VNG was the ulnar nerve (72.8%), followed by nerve to long head of triceps (8.8%) and sural nerve (8.2%); most common recipients were median (57.6%), axillary (12.5%), and musculocutaneous nerves (11.9%). Between patients who had medical research council scale scores, 69% had functional (M3 and above) motor and 72.7% sensory (S3<) recovery. Conclusions: Vascularized nerve grafts can increase the odds of functional gain in challenging conditions such as large nerve gaps, nerve avulsions, ruptures, and scarred and irradiated beds. With the exception of well-known VNG options, literature on alternative VNGs is largely confined to case reports and series, with additional published cases, outcomes, and basic science research needed to establish the role of VNGs in nerve repair. Clinical relevance: Our findings support the promise of VNGs for complex cases of nerve reconstruction. Evidence from published cases also indicates that VNGs enhance motor and sensory function recovery compared with traditional nerve grafting.

Indexed as

Nerve graftingNerve regenerationNerve repairVascularized nerve graft

Identifiers

PMID39381392
PMCPMC11456642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.