Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39381375›Full record

ReviewJournal of hand surgery global online2024

Nerve Coaptation in 2023: Adjuncts to Nerve Repair Beyond Suture.

Alexis L Clifford, Christopher S Klifto, Neill Y Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis L CliffordUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Christopher S KliftoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Neill Y LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective nerve coaptation entails tensionless repair of healthy fascicles with intact fascicular architecture and a well-vascularized environment, supportive of the regenerative cellular behaviors of neurons, immune cells, and Schwann cells. Suture coaptations have historically been used to ensure that these criteria are met for end-to-end repair, nerve transfers, and allograft or autograft reconstructions; however, unfortunately, overall restoration of function remains poor. As optimal coaptation is required for return of sensorimotor function, adjunct biomaterials are increasingly being enlisted attempting to optimize these suture-based coaptations. The purpose of this review was to discuss the biological, preclinical, and clinical data for the use of fibrin glue and nerve wraps made of type 1 collagen, porcine small intestine submucosa, chitosan, and human amniotic membrane. This study provides available data on each material's ability to optimize the regenerative potential of nerve repair as well as available outcomes data. Although each biomaterial discussed has benefits to nerve regeneration, at large, data remain heterogeneous, and continued investigation is required to fully understand the specific mechanisms involved and the long-term potential clinical impacts each can provide for improvement of sensorimotor outcomes.

Indexed as

Nerve coaptationNerve repairNerve wraps

Identifiers

PMID39381375
PMCPMC11456665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.